Overview

The way people categorise objects or concepts varies between individuals. Sometimes people aren’t even aware of how they categorise objects or concepts until you get them to think about it.

Sorting is a powerful way of discovering how individual people categorise things, and how much agreement and disagreement there is between individuals.

You can ask people to sort real objects like mobile phones or rock samples, and there are advantages in using the real thing if touch or smell are key features. But cards showing an image or text are much more manageable and are suitable for most purposes.

In a card sort each card shows a picture, or text such as a product name. Each card is given an identifying number.

We ask people to sort the cards repeatedly into groups (categories) of their own choice, using their own criteria. For each different criterion, we record which cards are in which category, using the identifying numbers on each card.

Advantages

•Cards are cheap and easy to produce, versatile and easy to manage.

•Cards showing images can be sorted by people who speak a different language to the researcher, or by people who can’t read, or can’t speak.

•Using numerals to identify cards means that recording and analysis can be done by someone who has no idea what’s being sorted. So card sorts can be used for sensitive topics, confidentiality can be safeguarded and researcher bias reduced.

How to do a card sort

We usually demonstrate card sorts using a pack of cards showing various drinking vessels – because most people will be familiar with them as a class of objects. This tutorial explains how we would carry out card sorting with a participant.

What you need:

•mini card pack to demonstrate the sorting process

•main card pack for the main card sorting.

•Sort the mini pack cards into groups.

•Demonstrate the names you’ve used for the groups and your overall criterion for sorting. So your groups might be “for wine”, “for beer or wine”, and “for beer”, using the criterion “the drink they’re intended for”.

•Explain that you would then re-sort them using a different criterion, such as “the material that they’re made of” .

•Mention that you could use “don’t know” and “not applicable” groups.

•Make it clear that there are no right or wrong answers.

Tip: Don’t let them see the main pack until you’ve finished your demonstration, or they’ll start sorting before you’ve finished explaining.

The picture below shows eight cards sorted into three  categories.

Tips:

•If they have trouble thinking of categories, choose two cards at random and ask what the main single difference is between them. This can then be used as the basis for a further sort.

Don’t comment on their categories, no matter how strange these are; usually, the categories make sense later.

If you think they’re trying to use two criteria for sorting at the same time (e.g using a group called “big and expensive”) then check tactfully and clarify that they can sort on each criterion in a separate sort (e.g. one for “size” and one for “cost”).

For example, if the participant says the groups are “high“, “medium” and “low“, you need to know what is high, medium or low.

The picture below shows how this is done. Note the commas between numbers, so you can tell the difference between 1,2 and 12 when using more than ten cards.

You continue repeating the process until:

•You run out of time.

•The participant can’t think of any more categories. If they want to keep going, and need a nudge, you can again choose two cards at random and ask for the main single difference between them, and then use this as the basis for another sort.

Where next?

You can analyse the card sorts results in various ways, including:

Content analysis on the criteria and groups that participants use, to identify important attributes.

Co-occurrence matrices to find out which cards are perceived as being most similar to which others, for e.g. identifying nearest competitors.

Other methods that fit well with card sorts

Card sorts are useful for finding out which categories people consider important, but they don’t tell you why the participant considers a particular category important, or what they mean by a particular term. To get this broader context, you can use:

Upward laddering on goals and values, to find out why the participant considers something important.

Downward laddering on explanations, to find out what the participant means by a particular term.

Copyleft Hyde & Rugg 2021